782

I have a Node.js project that requires Node version 12 or higher. Is there a way to specify this in the packages.json file, so that the installer will automatically check and inform the users if they need to upgrade?

5

8 Answers 8

984

You can set the engines field in your package.json and set requirements for either node or npm versions or both:

  "engines" : { 
    "npm" : ">=8.0.0 <9.0.0",
    "node" : ">=16.0.0 <17.0.0"
  }

To enforce this via npm you need to create an .npmrc file (and commit it to the repository) and set the engine-strict option to true, which will cause npm commands such as npm install to fail if the required engine versions to not match:

# .npmrc
engine-strict=true

Without that file, every developer will need to run npm config set engine-strict true in their local workspace to switch on this option.

Original Answer

As you're saying your code definitely won't work with any lower versions, you probably want the "engineStrict" flag too:

{ "engineStrict" : true }

Documentation for the package.json file can be found on the npmjs site

Update

engineStrict is now deprecated, so this will only give a warning. It's now down to the user to run npm config set engine-strict true if they want this.

Update 2

As ben pointed out below, creating a .npmrc file at the root of your project (the same level as your package.json file) with the text engine-strict=true will force an error during installation if the Node version is not compatible.

16
  • 23
    github.com/npm/npm/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#enginestrict "The rarely-used package.json option engineStrict has been deprecated for several months, producing warnings when it was used. Starting with npm@3, the value of the field is ignored, and engine violations will only produce warnings. If you, as a user, want strict engines field enforcement, just run npm config set engine-strict true"
    – uxcxdx
    Commented Dec 24, 2015 at 2:22
  • 1
    Remember to cd .. && npm i <folder-name> in order to check for the project itself. However, this will trigger a whole build in it self.
    – mlunoe
    Commented Jul 26, 2016 at 23:20
  • 11
    why on earth they deprecated that.. it looses all its meaning then Commented May 10, 2017 at 13:52
  • 42
    Adding engine-strict=true to your .npmrc now has the same effect
    – ben
    Commented Jun 13, 2018 at 5:23
  • 4
    @ben Perfect, thank you! And this can be committed so that at least your entire team is required to adhere to the engine version requirements. Commented Aug 3, 2019 at 4:25
356

Add the following to package.json:

"engines": {
  "npm": ">=8.0.0 <9.0.0",
  "node": ">=16.0.0 <17.0.0"
},

Add the following to .npmrc (same directory as package.json):

engine-strict=true
5
  • 5
    This is the easiest solution that gives the end user a nice fat error about not having the right version of node when they run npm install; works with yarn as well
    – jcollum
    Commented Jan 4, 2019 at 18:35
  • 8
    This seems to have no effect at all. I set up my package.json with an "engines" section similar to the above (11.13.0 and 6.7.0), and a .npmrc with nothing but content specified above. I had nvm switch me to an older node version, then ran npm install, but it just installs the dependencies and doesn't even mention the engine version mismatch.
    – Adrian
    Commented Apr 2, 2019 at 19:03
  • 3
    Adding engine-strict=true to your .npmrc file only enforces you to use the right engine when you install packages. It does not enforce anything for your end user. If you want your users to use the engines listed under the "engines: {}" property in your package.json when they install it, you should tell them to add engine-strict=true to their .npmrc file.
    – chharvey
    Commented Dec 27, 2020 at 15:34
  • 3
    @chharvey you could add to the package.json the script "preinstall": "echo 'engine-strict=true' >> .npmrc"
    – Mikel
    Commented May 5, 2021 at 17:21
  • engine-strict usage in .npmrc is currently not supported by direnv's .envrc github.com/direnv/direnv/wiki/Node (Found '.nvmrc' with version engine-strict=trueN/A: version "engine-strict=true -> N/A" is not yet installed.
    – svandragt
    Commented Aug 12, 2021 at 9:39
76

Just like said Ibam, engineStrict is now deprecated. But I've found this solution:

check-version.js:

import semver from 'semver';
import { engines } from './package';

const version = engines.node;
if (!semver.satisfies(process.version, version)) {
  console.log(`Required node version ${version} not satisfied with current version ${process.version}.`);
  process.exit(1);
}

package.json:

{
  "name": "my package",
  "engines": {
    "node": ">=50.9" // intentionally so big version number
  },
  "scripts": {
    "requirements-check": "babel-node check-version.js",
    "postinstall": "npm run requirements-check"
  }
}

Find out more here: https://medium.com/@adambisek/how-to-check-minimum-required-node-js-version-4a78a8855a0f#.3oslqmig4

.nvmrc

And one more thing. A dotfile '.nvmrc' can be used for requiring specific node version - https://github.com/creationix/nvm#nvmrc

But, it is only respected by npm scripts (and yarn scripts).

2
  • 4
    This is the best answer in 2019, in light of set engine deprecation and the reality that many are (likely) encountering this due to switching versions with nvm.
    – craft
    Commented Jan 29, 2019 at 2:19
  • 2
    This assumes @babel/node is installed. Commented Oct 27, 2020 at 17:25
69

.nvmrc

If you are using NVM like this, which you likely should, then you can indicate the nodejs version required for given project in a git-tracked .nvmrc file:

node --version > .nvmrc

or:

echo v10.15.1 > .nvmrc

This does not take effect automatically on cd, which is sane: the user must then do a:

nvm use

and now that version of node will be used for the current shell.

You can list the versions of node that you have with:

nvm list

.nvmrc is documented at: https://github.com/creationix/nvm/tree/02997b0753f66c9790c6016ed022ed2072c22603#nvmrc

How to automatically select that node version on cd was asked at: Automatically switch to correct version of Node based on project

Tested with NVM 0.33.11.

.nvmrc vs package.json engines

What you might want to do is:

much like package.json vs package-lock.json.

Heroku does respect package.json engines:

Worth mentioning, as documented here, Heroku does play it nice and obey the engines: entry e.g.:

  "engines": {
    "node": "14.17.0",
    "npm": "6.14.13"
  },

So you should Always, Always set that to what you are using locally.

This had been previously mentioned on this self deleted answer to this thread.

4
19

There's another, simpler way to do this:

  1. npm install Node@8 (saves Node 8 as dependency in package.json)
  2. Your app will run using Node 8 for anyone - even Yarn users!

This works because node is just a package that ships node as its package binary. It just includes as node_module/.bin which means it only makes node available to package scripts. Not main shell.

See discussion on Twitter here: https://twitter.com/housecor/status/962347301456015360

7
  • 7
    I disagree, this would potentially hide the issue and would sideload a different version of node if it wasn't installed. Commented Mar 14, 2018 at 17:44
  • 4
    Sounds like a great idea to me. Separate node versions for separate projects. Can safely upgrade one without upgrading the others. Only catch is have to run in .bin ./node node-sass rather than just node-sass. Not sure if same for all .bin files.
    – Jon
    Commented Aug 10, 2018 at 5:56
  • 4
    This is a simple and elegant solution - as long as the team members working on the product know this is happening, I think it's a great answer. We are using this technique at a large company to deal with the variety of Node versions for a dozen web front-end products. Removes the need for constant switching with nvm when going back and forth between products. Commented Sep 29, 2019 at 14:53
  • 5
    This solution has its own pros and cons. Node version encapsulation is potentially its biggest pro. The downside is bloated docker image size if you are going to deploy it this way.
    – ivosh
    Commented Oct 2, 2019 at 17:59
  • 1
    Am I misunderstanding something but, couldn't this be installed as a 'dev' dependency, so npm I -D Node@8, I'm guessing it wouldn't (shouldn't) then be bundled into a Docker image (or executable), which would simply provide it's own NodeJS runtime, right?
    – Big Rich
    Commented Apr 13, 2022 at 16:23
6

Here's my complete ready-to-use script, based on Adam's answer.

check-version.js :

/* eslint-disable no-console */
const fs = require('fs');
const semver = require('semver');
const childProcess = require('child_process');

// checks that current node and npm versions satisfies requirements in package.json
// to run manually:   node check-version.js [verbose]

const VERBOSE_FORCED = false;    
const args = process.argv.slice(2);
const VERBOSE = VERBOSE_FORCED || (args.length > 0 && args[0] === 'verbose');

const printErrAndExit = (x) => {
  console.error(x);
  console.error('Aborting');
  process.exit(1);
};

const checkNpmVersion = (npmVersionRequired) => {
  if (!npmVersionRequired) {
    console.log('No required npm version specified');
    return;
  }
  const npmVersion = `${childProcess.execSync('npm -v')}`.trim();
  if (VERBOSE) console.log(`npm required: '${npmVersionRequired}' - current: '${npmVersion}'`);
  if (!semver.satisfies(npmVersion, npmVersionRequired)) {
    printErrAndExit(`Required npm version '${npmVersionRequired}' not satisfied. Current: '${npmVersion}'.`);
  }
};

const checkNodeVersion = (nodeVersionRequired) => {
  if (!nodeVersionRequired) {
    console.log('No required node version specified');
    return;
  }
  const nodeVersion = process.version;
  if (VERBOSE) console.log(`node required: '${nodeVersionRequired}' - current: '${nodeVersion}'`);
  if (!semver.satisfies(nodeVersion, nodeVersionRequired)) {
    printErrAndExit(`Required node version '${nodeVersionRequired}' not satisfied. Current: '${nodeVersion}'.`);
  }
};

const json = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('./package.json'));
if (!json.engines) printErrAndExit('no engines entry in package json?');
checkNodeVersion(json.engines.node);
checkNpmVersion(json.engines.npm);

It should be placed in the root project directory.

It checks node and/or npm version, as specified in package.json (engines entry), eg

  "engines": {
    "node": ">=16.0.0 <17.0.0",
    "npm": ">=8.0.0 <9.0.0"
  },

You can invoke it manually as

node check-version.js [verbose]

or include it as script inside package json, either as standalone script or as a prerequisite for other scripts, eg

"scripts" : {
  "start": "node check-version.js && vite",
  "build": "node check-version.js && vite build",
  "lint": "node check-version.js && eslint .",
  "check-version": "node check-version.js verbose"
},
1
  • but this cannot prevent user running npm install right? Commented Mar 21 at 3:25
1
"engines": {
    "node": ">=20.0.0"
  }
-1

A Mocha test case example:

describe('Check version of node', function () {
    it('Should test version assert', async function () {

            var version = process.version;
            var check = parseFloat(version.substr(1,version.length)) > 12.0;
            console.log("version: "+version);
            console.log("check: " +check);         
            assert.equal(check, true);
    });});
13
  • 1
    Should not be a unit test, use package.json /dotfiles
    – Ben G
    Commented Dec 10, 2019 at 6:36
  • 2
    But whhhhhhhy, a unit test is designed for this >.- Commented Mar 31, 2020 at 13:21
  • 1
    Because you need Node to run a unit test. If the node version present is too outdated, the tests will simply not run or they'll fail with syntax error or smth. similar, which defeats the point of unit testing. It's like hiding a password reset form behind an authorization form. If you can't remember the password, you need to use reset password function, but now you can't use it, because you don't remember the password.
    – ankhzet
    Commented Jun 15, 2020 at 8:34
  • My assumption being there is at least a minimal packages installed. why else enforce a specific one. Commented Mar 20, 2021 at 16:40
  • 1
    As a number of node runtimes grows (deno.js, bun.js, ts-node etc.) this "unit" test becomes even more useless =D And again, OP asked about a fail-safe for an installer. Tests are run after an installation already completed, at best. You have a chicken and an egg problem here.
    – ankhzet
    Commented Aug 21, 2022 at 3:48

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.